Aus Game Frontier / Our people
Meet the editorial team
Good comparisons start with different perspectives. Our editorial team brings research, practical usability checks and a clear explanation of what matters to Australian players into one guide.
We focus on digital entertainment: how easily you can explore a game library, understand a platform’s features and decide whether its experience suits you. Each role has a distinct responsibility, but every comparison benefits from a second perspective before publication. Here is how the people behind Aus Game Frontier turn information into useful reading.
Meet the people ↓
Three roles. One editorial standard.
The people behind the comparisons
AM
Editorial lead
Alex Morgan
Alex shapes our coverage and makes sure each recommendation has an understandable reason behind it. An interest in strategy and adventure games informs the questions Alex asks: does a platform help players discover something worthwhile, and does the description explain the experience clearly?
Before publication, Alex checks that our ranking rationale follows the evidence and that strengths and limitations receive fair attention. Alex works with Priya on factual differences between platforms and with Sam on how those differences are presented. When a reader raises a correction, Alex assesses its effect on the comparison and coordinates the update. The priority is a guide that helps you choose for yourself, with enough context to understand our judgement.
PE
Platform research editor
Priya Ellis
Priya follows the details that can make a platform description useful or misleading. That means reviewing official game information, examining how libraries are organised and checking whether genre labels accurately describe the content readers will find.
Australian availability statements receive particular attention. Priya distinguishes a platform’s general offering from information that specifically applies to Australian visitors, and records the official sources supporting a comparison. If access conditions or features vary, the description should explain that distinction rather than suggest a universal experience. Priya passes research notes to Sam for a clarity review and flags material differences for Alex’s final assessment. The reader’s priority comes first: knowing what to expect before following a link to a third-party service.
ST
Usability editor
Sam Taylor
Sam looks at the journey from curiosity to finding something to play. Navigation, readable descriptions and the clarity of search and filter controls all influence whether a large collection feels approachable or frustrating.
Sam reviews our explanations from a reader’s perspective, asking whether unfamiliar terms need context and whether a stated feature offers a practical benefit. Accessibility considerations include clear labels, legible information and ways to navigate without relying on visual cues alone. These observations inform our editorial assessment rather than a formal accessibility certification. Sam works with Priya to keep descriptions faithful to the research and with Alex to make the final comparison easy to follow. The aim is useful detail without making readers work through unnecessary complexity.
From research to review
How the team works together
Our common criteria are content, structure, usability, features and overall experience. We consider how those elements work together, rather than treating a long feature list as proof that a platform will suit everyone.
Research the offering
Priya records official sources and the information relevant to Australian readers. Research notes distinguish published platform details from our own editorial observations, giving the next reviewer a clear basis for checking the draft.
Check the explanation
Sam reviews clarity, navigation descriptions and practical usability. The team checks that important limitations are visible and that readers can understand why a feature matters without specialist knowledge.
Review and maintain
Alex checks the final comparison against our criteria. We review key listings quarterly and after credible correction reports, preserving material change records so that significant revisions can be traced through our editorial work.
Commercial relationships and editorial judgement
Some links may earn Aus Game Frontier an affiliate commission at no additional cost to readers. We disclose potential commissions and keep commercial input separate from editorial conclusions. A commercial relationship does not replace the research or determine how we explain a platform’s strengths and limitations.
